Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 09:31

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Are We Wrong About Dark Matter? Dwarf Galaxies Suggest So - SciTechDaily
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Field of 16: Will Mexico be dream homecoming for Daniel Suárez? - NASCAR.com
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
How do you feel about Donald Trump signing an executive order that says there are only two genders?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Thank you.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What’s next?
Want to lower your cholesterol? Try a daily cup of this common bean - The Independent
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Russia bombards Ukraine with 479 drones overnight, Ukrainian air force says - ABC News